2Q Earnings: The Beat Goes On?

The earnings bar is fairly low for the second quarter, setting companies up for a potential easy jump—but there will likely be more focus on forward guidance.

The second quarter 2025 earnings reporting season for the S&P 500 begins with investors facing a mix of slowing earnings momentum, ongoing macroeconomic uncertainty, and high expectations for the Technology and Communication Services. As detailed below, second quarter earnings are expected to rise less than 6% year-over-year, with wide sector divergences persisting. Strong year-over-year growth is expected for Communication Services (32%) and Technology (+18%), offset by notable weakness in Energy (-25%). Technology sector earnings are expected to remain strong throughout this year, while Communication Services' growth is expected to slow significantly in the second half. On the other hand, the laggard Energy sector's growth rate is expected to improve as the year progresses.

Second quarter earnings are expected to rise less than 6% year-over-year, with wide sector divergences persisting.

Source: Charles Schwab, LSEG I/B/E/S, as of 7/3/2025.

S&P 500 sectors shown. Sectors are based on the Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS®), an industry analysis framework developed by MSCI and S&P Dow Jones Indices to provide investors with consistent industry definitions. Forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research and are developed through analysis of historical public data. Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Guidance and earnings surprises will take on heightened importance as markets remain sensitive to forward-looking commentary, especially amid policy uncertainty and instability related to trade, tariffs, and interest rates. There is also increased attention being given to stocks of companies that don't meet or beat consensus estimates. As shown below, post-earnings stock price performance (for the first trading day following releases) remains asymmetric, with much stronger downside reaction to misses than upside to beats.

Misses get beaten

Post-earnings stock price performance remains asymmetric, with much stronger downside reaction to misses than upside to beats.

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 6/30/2025.

Member performance in excess of S&P 500 based on gain or loss following day in which earnings are reported. Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

No extrapolation

Second-quarter earnings follow what were very strong earnings in the first quarter, relative to where expectations were at the start of that reporting season. You can see the hook higher in the blue line in the chart below. Estimates were for less than 8% before first quarter reporting season began in April—a bar set too low given the ultimate growth rate of nearly 14%. However, as shown, analysts have not extrapolated that stronger growth into the remaining quarters this year. That suggests policy-related uncertainty and instability continues to cloud the outlook; but could also mean the bar has been (yet again) set too low as we move into the meat of second quarter reporting season.

Q1 strength not carrying

Relative to first quarter earnings expectations, estimates are tepid for the remaining quarters this year.

Source: Charles Schwab, LSEG I/B/E/S, as of 7/3/2025.

Forecasts contained herein are for illustrative purposes only, may be based upon proprietary research and are developed through analysis of historical public data. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Incorporating the actual releases from the small percentage of S&P 500 companies having already reported second quarter results, and as shown below, the revenue beat rate has soared above the more muted earnings beat rate. It's too early to state with any certainty, but what would be suggested by a continued divergence between the two is that profit margins may be coming under increasing policy-related pressure.

Divergence between revenue and earnings beat rates

Incorporating the actual releases from the small percentage of S&P 500 companies having already reported second quarter results, the revenue beat rate has soared above the more muted earnings beat rate.

Source: Charles Schwab, LSEG I/B/E/S, as of 7/3/2025.

Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Guide us

Building on the momentum from the first quarter of the year, the number of companies issuing positive EPS guidance for the second quarter has picked up sharply. Per data from FactSet through the end of June, more than 100 S&P 500 companies issued guidance for the second quarter—51 of which issued positive guidance, shown in the chart below. So far, that's above both the five-year average of 42 and 10-year average of 39.

In terms of tariffs' impact on companies' bottom lines, we can say so far, so good. In fairness, second-quarter results are unlikely to incorporate the full tariff effect, given the many pauses that were enacted for certain countries and sectors; as well as the fact that the effective U.S. tariff rate hadn't yet reached double digits by the end of May.

Jump

Through the end of June, more than 100 S&P 500 companies issued guidance for the second quarter—51 of which issued positive guidance.

Source: Charles Schwab, FactSet, as of 6/30/2025.

Most of the jump in positive guidance has been driven by the Technology sector, which has nearly 30 companies issuing positive guidance for the quarter. In contrast, the next highest number is seven for the Industrials sector, as shown in the chart below. Also worth mentioning is that Technology has seen the largest increase in the number of companies issuing negative guidance for the quarter—but importantly, the current total of 16 is below the five-year average of 20.4.

Tech driving revisions higher

Most of the jump in positive guidance has been driven by the Tech sector, which has nearly 30 companies issuing positive guidance for the quarter.

Source: Charles Schwab, FactSet, as of 6/30/2025.

Putting the guidance picture together, much like the stock market over the past couple months, things have improved sharply. As shown below, Citi's U.S. Earnings Revisions Index (ERI) has jumped back into positive territory after falling to its lowest level since the 2022 and pandemic bear markets.

Lean back (into positive territory)

Citi's U.S. Earnings Revisions Index (ERI) has jumped back into positive territory after falling to its lowest levels since the 2022 and pandemic bear markets.

Source: Charles Schwab, Bloomberg, as of 6/27/2025.

The Citi U.S. Earnings Revisions Index is calculated as the ratio of analysts' earnings per share revisions to listed companies tracking equity analyst revisions upgrades (positive) vs. downgrades (negative). Indexes are unmanaged, do not incur management fees, costs and expenses and cannot be invested in directly. Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

In sum

Analysts continue to expect growth in corporate earnings, but as we head into the beginning of reporting season, estimates remain tepid for the second quarter. If companies manage to step over a low bar and (in aggregate) maintain a fair degree of confidence when it comes to policy risks, we could face a repeat of the first quarter—during which the blended growth rate moved higher throughout the season. As pointed out in our midyear outlook, however, the economy still faces several headwinds. Ultimately, earnings will be the lens through which we can judge its resilience in the face of tariffs, higher rates, and a slowing labor market. So far, so good; but we think the bulk of the market's focus will be on forward guidance as opposed to backward-looking results.